« The last-second review... | Main | Big 12 explains rule that allowed Texas' game-winning FG »

December 06, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Walt Anderson, the Big 12 supervisor of officials, is a piece of Shit. He should be made to pay for his crime.

OK you set the precedence, in this game there were 129 plays. are you going to go back and review everyone of them, if done, then you would find that you would have to add at least 129 seconds back to the game if not more because on some plays more than a second run off. Or is this rule only applied when the conferences top BCS contender is in jeopardy? And how is the clock running at its normal pace considered a malfunction or excuse me, an error? I witnessed errors during this game but none with the clock.

The comments to this entry are closed.