Armstrong's lawyers have said illegal government leaks are the reason why mammoth media outlets such as 60 Minutes, the AP, Sports Illustrated and a few others have published or aired damning stories that the seven-time Tour de France champion was a roid guy.
Why do I think Armstrong wouldn't have a problem with details leaked that say Armstrong saved cats stuck in trees?
The way this story is evolving Armstrong is likely going to be thrown in the same lot as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and a host of other sports "heroes". We know their accomplishments are more than very likely tainted by a syringe. The evidence to suggest they used is pretty overwhelming, but it can't be proven in court. Even if it is chances are good there is a growing sector of the population that regards Armstrong as a guy who was exceptional at his craft, used PEDs to be even better at what he did to secure long-term personal fame and fortune, and no one got hurt in the process.
Ultimately, he wins but there is a price to secure his "victory".
Facebook Mac Engel